Be clear on information about amalgamation
Times Colonist Letters
October 16, 2014
Re: “One amalgamation question, not 13” and “View Royal denied voice on amalgamation,” letter, Oct. 14.
One of the difficulties I have with the current amalgamation debate is the lack of clear information made available to the public about such an important issue. This is exemplified by these two letters.
One writer claims that the Capital Regional District will no longer exist with amalgamation. This is simply untrue. Regional districts are mandated by the province and, not only that, the CRD is far bigger than just Greater Victoria.
Another writer lists the votes from one discussion at a View Royal council meeting, but fails to mention that there had been numerous discussions at our table, and at one time we had unanimous agreement to place a question on the ballot.
In the end, it was largely the inability to agree on a question that led to our decision. Some supported a Saanich-type question while others did not. Regardless, the public must have clear and accurate information on this issue.
By all accounts, Greater Victoria has evolved into a wonderful place to live and there are many things we do exceedingly well in the CRD. Before we rush to “fix” what some think is wrong, let us realize that the very future and governance of our collective home is at stake.
David Screech
View Royal
Times Colonist Letters
October 16, 2014
Re: “One amalgamation question, not 13” and “View Royal denied voice on amalgamation,” letter, Oct. 14.
One of the difficulties I have with the current amalgamation debate is the lack of clear information made available to the public about such an important issue. This is exemplified by these two letters.
One writer claims that the Capital Regional District will no longer exist with amalgamation. This is simply untrue. Regional districts are mandated by the province and, not only that, the CRD is far bigger than just Greater Victoria.
Another writer lists the votes from one discussion at a View Royal council meeting, but fails to mention that there had been numerous discussions at our table, and at one time we had unanimous agreement to place a question on the ballot.
In the end, it was largely the inability to agree on a question that led to our decision. Some supported a Saanich-type question while others did not. Regardless, the public must have clear and accurate information on this issue.
By all accounts, Greater Victoria has evolved into a wonderful place to live and there are many things we do exceedingly well in the CRD. Before we rush to “fix” what some think is wrong, let us realize that the very future and governance of our collective home is at stake.
David Screech
View Royal